Project: Documentary in the gallery space
Exercise: Reading the Cruel and Tender brochure and listening to interviews with Rineke Dijkstra and Fazal Sheikh.
Rather than the feared demise in the volume and value of Documentary photography which was anticipated at the turn of the millennium as the print media’s funds and circulation declined, it would appear that Documentary as a genre is thriving.
Cruel and Tender, Tate Modern’s first photographic exhibition shown in 2003 pointed the the way forward, moving documentary decisively into the gallery space. It seems (with such a large selection of work) as if there was a definite intention to reintroduce documentary, historical and contemporary to a new audience, or at least to an audience that had shifted from print media to the gallery and the internet.
Rineke Dijkstra made several interesting points in her interview. The first was how she thought that the sitter’s reaction to the camera had changed over time. She said that she thought people were more relaxed in front of the camera in past times because they were not aware of the how powerful the images could be. Contemporary sitters will almost certainly aware of what the camera could tell about them and maybe were on edge or could ‘play’ to the camera. She explained that is why she felt she had to isolate her subjects, not only to remove distractions from the sitter but also to isolate the situation to make it easier for the viewer to identify with it. She also talked about her intentions on the showing of the two series, Bullfighters and Mothers saying that originally she didn’t think about displaying the aggressive and nurturing traits in men and women together explaining that she thought it was a cliché. However it was my thought that perhaps, given the intention of the gallery to widen the appeal of Documentary as Art, perhaps they used this cliché to good effect.
Fazal Sheikh also referred to the importance of isolating his sitters as portrait subjects, but also that they remain in the context of their situation. His motivation for revisiting the area over several years was to correct what he saw as the misrepresentation of their situation i.e. the portrayal of the Somali refugees as starving malnourished communities in desert camps. He was also keen to explain the importance of using text with his images to explain the complexities of their situations and that sometimes text and image together had a greater value than either in isolation. This extended form of documentary which gets to tell a complete story over time is a valuable means of communication, especially in the gallery space where there is room to display the work effectively and in which the audience is already actively engaged by wanting to be there and spend time immersed in the story.
The link for the Diane Smyth article has changed: http://www.tomhunter.org/think-global-act-local/ and can now be found on Tom Hunter’s website.
Exercise: Summary of thoughts on Tom Hunter’s work
When I first looked at the website I was overwhelmed by the sheer volume of his work. He is certainly a prolific artist. Thinking about the article by Diane Smyth, Think Global Act Local, I can understand why Hunter agrees with the first of Wombell’s comments and I can see the value in photographing your immediate surroundings with all of the depth of knowledge and experience that it can bring to your work. On Wombell’s second point, I think that it is too broad a subject to boil down into an argument about digital versus analogue photography. I do agree with Hunter that analogue photography is right if you want to make the quality of image that he excels in. I looked at all of the galleries on his website. Some particularly stood out. His “Unheralded Stories” in which tableaux of period costumed individuals are juxtaposed in museum recreations from a different time, was surreal. Axis Mundi, photographs of standing megaliths in the South of England also resonated with me. An interesting point that he made was that he thought that Art Photography (as opposed to photojournalism) gives you more control over how your work is seen. I listened twice to the podcast in which he explained how he was inspired by the work of Vermeer, how he was a painter of the people and social realism. He also explained the importance of colour and light in his work. Tom Hunter produces carefully crafted, beautiful images which also have a social narrative. He is undoubtedly a positive influence on a number of photographers today.
Exercise: Reflection on the work of Hasan and Husain Essop
This is an interesting video. I had to watch it a few times to actually realise that the twins were the only figures in these very complex performances. I was familiar with the idea that Muslims to not incorporate images of “life” into their homes or architecture. What is refreshing about this work is that these young men are pushing the against the traditions of Islam in order to preserve it.
Exercise: Reflect on the Documentary value of Jeff Wall’s work
I got very little from the Pluk magazine article so I referenced many of my books that contained opinions and ideas about Wall’s work. Initially, I was a little sceptical that work of that complexity would lose something of its value as a document in its execution. I suppose I am still hanging on to the idea that the immediacy of the photojournalistic image, shot as the action happens, has more veracity. But the more I read and learn about restaged events and documentary “fictions” , I am coming to realise the value of “different” truths. Commentary on social issues by means of presenting an interpretation by the artist will at least provoke a discussion.
I have discussed the work of Joan Fontcuberta in a review of the recent study visit to “Stranger than Fiction” https://richard506896documentary.wordpress.com/2014/09/28/study-visit-stranger-than-fictionjoan-fontcuberta-26-sept-2014/